Another few plots on extreme heat and corn yields

This is similar to something I put up the other day, except with just three states: Iowa, Missouri and Minnesota.  That makes it a little easier to see. 

Also, David Lobell suggested my remarks about Kansas may be a little off since Kansas is so heavily irrigated.  It might be better to draw comparisons between non-irrigated states with different temperature profiles.

So these three states are about the same latitude.  Iowa is the nations sweet spot--the best soils and the best climate.  Minnesota tends to be a bit cooler than ideal; Missouri is too hot. 

I've also added a scatter plot to show the strong association between extreme heat and yield.  The outliers in the bottom left of the scatter (cool years with low yields) are from the Great Flood of 1993. I've added regression lines that fit the relationship separately for each state, one for 1980-1995 and one for 1996-2010.  While Iowa seems to show more heat tolerance in the more recent period, Missouri looks less heat tolerant in the more recent period.  But since Iowa really hasn't experienced any extreme heat since 1996, that flat curve is probably spurious.  Also, keep in mind there are no other variables here, and just a little bit of extreme heat probably means lots of beneficial, less-than-extreme heat.


(click for larger view)

When I have a little more time I'll try dig into this stuff a little more.  But so far we've found no evidence that crop varieties grown in warmer climates are more heat tolerant than those in cooler climates, and if anything heat tolerance is declining.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nonlinear Temperature Effects Indicate Severe Damages to U.S. Crop Yields Under Climate Change

Image
It's been a long haul, but my coauthor Wolfram Schlenker and I have finally published our article with the title of this blog post in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . We've been told that it would show up on the early-edition website this week. It hasn't shown up there yet so I guess it will come out tomorrow [Friday 8/28], probably late afternoon EST. UPDATE: You can find the article here . We set out to develop a better statistical model linking weather and U.S. crop yields for corn, soybeans and cotton, the largest three crops in the U.S. in production value. Our major new finding is that (by far) the best predictor of yield is a measure of extreme heat: how much temperatures exceed about 29C (84F) during the growing season. The threshold varies somewhat by crop--29C is the threshold for corn. Below this threshold, warmer temperatures are more beneficial for yields, but the damaging effects of temperatures much above 29C are staggeringly large. A
Read more

Commodity Prices and the Fed

I think Mark Thoma nails this .  What he describes is exactly the way I think about the issue but have been unable to articulate. To answer the question in the title of this post, it's useful to think of an island with only two goods. One of the goods is non-renewable, but highly desirable. The other good is less preferred, but it is renewable (thinking of renewable and non-renewable energy resources, for example). The key is to distinguish between changes in prices that reflect changes in the relative scarcity of the two goods, and changes driven by increases in the money supply. Over time, as the stock of the more desired good falls due to consumption, the price of this good will rise relative to the renewable good. Consumers will be hit by increases in the cost of living -- the same basket of the two goods purchased last year now costs more. But is this the kind of increase in prices the Fed should respond to? No, the price increase -- and the increase in the c
Read more