For now, just two:
1) Environmental economists are still arguing about prices verses quantities. That is, should we cap-and-trade or tax pollution. The academic debate differs a lot from the public one. The current focus is on how these policies might interact with incentives to innovate. I'm not expert here at all, but to me this looks like really small stuff--to a first and even second approximation I still don't see a difference.
2) Airplane taxi time looks like an important contributor to pollution for those living close to airports. Who knew? Another reason not to live close to LAX, besides the noise, traffic congestion, and whatever else you may not like about the concrete jungle.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Renewable energy not as costly as some think
The other day Marshall and Sol took on Bjorn Lomborg for ignoring the benefits of curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Indeed. But Bjorn, am...
-
It's been a long haul, but my coauthor Wolfram Schlenker and I have finally published our article with the title of this blog post in th...
-
The other day Marshall and Sol took on Bjorn Lomborg for ignoring the benefits of curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Indeed. But Bjorn, am...
-
A couple months ago the New York Times convened a conference " Food for Tomorrow: Farm Better. Eat Better. Feed the World ." ...
No comments:
Post a Comment