I liked Paul Krugman's column today.
One thing he did not exactly say but I wish he had: Commodity price rises have little to do with monetary and currency policies in the US and around the world. To the extent that they are connected, they are connected through the market's attempt to correct long-held imbalances, particularly China's undervalued currency. China's inflation is the market fighting that undervaluation, and that inflation is helping to spur demand for commodities. But what's important to note is that the underlying demand is fundamental: it would have been there long ago except for China's past suppression of it through currency policy. By the same token, China's inflation is helping to balance our trade deficit.
We'd be wise to think about possible collateral damage of higher commodity prices, since I suspect high prices could be here to stay. But this really should have no bearing on monetary policy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Renewable energy not as costly as some think
The other day Marshall and Sol took on Bjorn Lomborg for ignoring the benefits of curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Indeed. But Bjorn, am...
-
It's been a long haul, but my coauthor Wolfram Schlenker and I have finally published our article with the title of this blog post in th...
-
The other day Marshall and Sol took on Bjorn Lomborg for ignoring the benefits of curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Indeed. But Bjorn, am...
-
A couple months ago the New York Times convened a conference " Food for Tomorrow: Farm Better. Eat Better. Feed the World ." ...
No comments:
Post a Comment