How should crop insurance premiums adjust to a changing climate in order to remain actuarial fair?
Short answer: Very slowly.
That seems pretty obvious to me, and hopefully to anyone who thinks about it for a few minutes, even if you think climate change is ultimately going to have big impacts. Moreover, the way crop insurance premiums are already determined---as a function a farmer's own recent yield history---gradual adjustment of premiums will take place naturally.
So, what should USDA's Risk Management Agency do, if we think nasty crop outcomes like last year are going to be more frequent going forward?
Well, I'll abstain from making a recommendation, but I will say that if they do absolutely nothing, there will be no significant budgetary implications.
None of this is to say that there might not be other ways to improve crop insurance.
Update: So, if this issue is so unimportant, why do I mention
it? Because I'm seeing and hearing the question a lot, and my general
sense is that energy and resources might be better spent on other issues.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Renewable energy not as costly as some think
The other day Marshall and Sol took on Bjorn Lomborg for ignoring the benefits of curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Indeed. But Bjorn, am...
-
It's been a long haul, but my coauthor Wolfram Schlenker and I have finally published our article with the title of this blog post in th...
-
The other day Marshall and Sol took on Bjorn Lomborg for ignoring the benefits of curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Indeed. But Bjorn, am...
-
A couple months ago the New York Times convened a conference " Food for Tomorrow: Farm Better. Eat Better. Feed the World ." ...
No comments:
Post a Comment