The story used to be that inflation was bad for an economy because greater levels inflation led to greater levels of inflation uncertainty.
Uncertainty isn't exactly the same as volatility, but in practice we often equate the two when we economists do empirical work. So, while I'm not a macro guy, a long, long time ago I wrote a paper for a graduate macro class on the link between inflation and inflation uncertainty. I just used standard time series analysis to predict inflation and then looked at my prediction error in relation to the level of inflation. I didn't see much of a link even then.
Today I see even less of one. To be honest, I haven't run the regressions. I'm just looking at this picture from FRED.
Back in the seventies and early eighties we might have logically conflated levels of inflation with inflation volatility. But today, and over the past decade, inflation has been low and inflation volatility quite high.
The real macro guys probably have a good explanation for this. But whatever it may be, I also wonder if somewhat higher rates of inflation--say the 3-4 percent we had in the 90s, would actually be more stable.
Could this be yet another reason to have a higher inflation target?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Renewable energy not as costly as some think
The other day Marshall and Sol took on Bjorn Lomborg for ignoring the benefits of curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Indeed. But Bjorn, am...
-
It's been a long haul, but my coauthor Wolfram Schlenker and I have finally published our article with the title of this blog post in th...
-
The other day Marshall and Sol took on Bjorn Lomborg for ignoring the benefits of curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Indeed. But Bjorn, am...
-
A couple months ago the New York Times convened a conference " Food for Tomorrow: Farm Better. Eat Better. Feed the World ." ...
No comments:
Post a Comment