The Renminbi

So China says they are (finally) going to revalue their currency and "gradually" move toward a floating exchange rate. NY Times article here.

I think that is good news.  I really hope it happens soon.

I'm a bit outside my element here, but I don't see how they can do this gradually.  Well, maybe if the keep the timing and size of the adjustment close to their vest they can keep some control.  But then what's the point of revaluing?

Update: I should probably refrain from oblique posts.  To the commenter who explains why China has pegged the Yuan to the dollar and why, in principle, they are revaluing: Yes I understand.  My question had to do with the "gradually" part.  The point is that once the market knows China is going to revalue or stop pegging, the market won't let China do it gradually.  Thus, when China says they are going to do this gradually it's almost as if they are announcing nothing at all. This is something we need to see to believe.

Comments

  1. AnonymousJune 19, 2010 at 3:31 PM

    To your question, "what's the point of revaluing?" The artificial control of the renminbi's value against other currencies, particularly the US dollar and the Euro, is that in depressing its value, it makes Chinese exports cheaper than they would be "naturally," and makes imports more expensive. This is great for China, but not so for those who'd like to export TO China. The act of revaluation would appease unhappy trade partners, but yeah, it does remain to be seen whether it's a cosmetic or serious revaluation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJune 19, 2010 at 4:58 PM

    I think the Chinese will stall, stall, stall. There is only one reason they made this "promise." That is to forestall any pressure at the next G20.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nonlinear Temperature Effects Indicate Severe Damages to U.S. Crop Yields Under Climate Change

Image
It's been a long haul, but my coauthor Wolfram Schlenker and I have finally published our article with the title of this blog post in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . We've been told that it would show up on the early-edition website this week. It hasn't shown up there yet so I guess it will come out tomorrow [Friday 8/28], probably late afternoon EST. UPDATE: You can find the article here . We set out to develop a better statistical model linking weather and U.S. crop yields for corn, soybeans and cotton, the largest three crops in the U.S. in production value. Our major new finding is that (by far) the best predictor of yield is a measure of extreme heat: how much temperatures exceed about 29C (84F) during the growing season. The threshold varies somewhat by crop--29C is the threshold for corn. Below this threshold, warmer temperatures are more beneficial for yields, but the damaging effects of temperatures much above 29C are staggeringly large. A
Read more

Renewable energy not as costly as some think

Image
The other day Marshall and Sol took on Bjorn Lomborg for ignoring the benefits of curbing greenhouse gas emissions.  Indeed.  But Bjorn, among others, is also notorious for exaggerating costs.  That fact is that most serious estimates of reducing emissions are fairly low, and there is good reason to believe cost estimates are too high for the simple fact that analysts cannot measure or imagine all ways we might curb emissions.  Anything analysts cannot model translates into cost exaggeration. Hawai`i is a good case in point.  Since moving to Hawai`i I've started digging into energy, in large part because the situation in Hawai`i is so interesting.  Here we make electricity mainly from oil, which is super expensive.  We are also rich in sun and wind.  Add these facts to Federal and state subsidies and it spells a remarkable energy revolution.  Actually, renewables are now cost effective even without subsidies. In the video below Matthias Fripp, who I'm lucky to be working w
Read more